Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
CARDING & HACKING
FLOODING & OFFTOPIC
On the side of the screen / VIRUS
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prime" data-source="post: 628" data-attributes="member: 18"><p><img src="https://telegra.ph/file/f3770cc9f7f198589b516.jpg" alt="f3770cc9f7f198589b516.jpg" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Level 99 Paranoid.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="https://telegra.ph/file/105b1185c40ebb93528c8.png" alt="105b1185c40ebb93528c8.png" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>ZOMBO BOX</p><p></p><p><a href="https://ia802902.us.archive.org/27/items/coronavirus2020.ru/Coronavirus%202020%20%D0%A1%D0%A3%D0%94%D0%9D%D0%AB%D0%99%20%D0%93%D0%9E%D0%94%20%20%D0%A1%D0%9C%D0%9E%D0%A2%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%A2%D0%AC%20%D0%92%D0%A1%D0%95%D0%9C.mp4" target="_blank">For starters, you can look at this vidos.</a></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Illuminati Freemasons CIA NSA FSB Russian hackers</strong> . Nesting dolls Bears Sweatshirts Balalaikas. This is all bullshit. Compared to what you learn.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The ubiquity of digital television and flat panel televisions is an absolute boon to consumers. But it is possible that the special services will benefit from this much more - these two technologies make it possible to monitor everyone. Right at his house!</p><p></p><p>In the late 1990s, television began to gradually lose ground in front of the aggressively advancing Internet. Television companies were baffled by the future loss of advertising revenue and wondered what alternative to offer their subscribers. But they had nothing special to oppose to the world wide web.</p><p>[/LIST]</p><p></p><p>Popular websites could operate with such a trump card as contextual thematic advertising, flexible and automatically adapting to the interests of the user, based on the history of his search queries, while when displaying advertisements, TV channels could focus only on the "average" subscriber, information about which was obtained from sociological research.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>With the advent of digital television (in particular, IPTV), this task has become even easier - it has become possible to track the data on the corresponding servers of providers. However, to show contextual thematic advertising, TV companies needed extremely unusual information - in particular, what exactly people are doing at the very moment when they are watching TV.</p><p></p><p><strong>Do they prepare breakfast while doing this?</strong></p><p></p><p>Do you watch the program before going to bed while lying in bed? Do they dress in front of the mirror in the morning, watching the news on the screen out of the corner of their eye? And what was required was not just "averaged" data (even if based on studies of hundreds of thousands of people), but about each - yes, about each! - to the subscriber.</p><p></p><p><strong>Unsolvable problem:</strong></p><p></p><p>With this seemingly insoluble problem, representatives of the television broadcasting company NeoBroad turned to the American research corporation FICTUM (Factual Integrated Collection and Trends Unification Methods), which specialized in such tasks.</p><p></p><p>The research department of the corporation (Department of Advanced Concepts, DAC) at that time was headed by the legendary Canadian with French roots - Dr. Nicolas Pannier, who worked for a long time in the bowels of the American military-industrial complex.</p><p></p><p><em>The original idea of FICTUM engineers was very simple - it was to install video cameras in all TVs. However, such a "head-on" solution to the problem was almost immediately abandoned (at that time, cameras were still quite expensive and not too compact, and it was a question of integrating a camera into every TV, that is, about hundreds of thousands or even millions of pieces!) ...</em></p><p></p><p>And then Nicolas Pannier, who for many years has been developing stealth aircraft and phased radars in American defense companies, put forward a brilliant idea. He suggested using the TV screen itself for collecting data.</p><p></p><p><strong>On the other side of the screen:</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When light hits them from outside, get a response. "It was in this direction that Panier's group began to work - scientists were engaged in registering a change in the control signal supplied to the transistors of the active matrix, depending on the distribution of the screen illumination outside.</p><p></p><p>The research took six months. After that, Panier's group was faced with another almost unsolvable task - it was required to decipher the data obtained. The TV screen is not equipped with any optical systems, so there could be no question of any "image". Here Panier was helped by his past experience: after all, the phased antenna array (PAR) of the radar also does not have focusing systems.</p><p></p><p>Taking as a basis the algorithms for restoring the radar signal, Panier had already by 2000 built a prototype of a system capable of "spying" on what is happening in front of the TV screen. Moreover, this did not require any hardware intervention in the TV circuit - the solution worked at the level of firmware (firmware) of an STB set-top box (Set Top Box, cable TV decoder) and a TV, which could be updated remotely via the network at the operator's command (data on the provider received the TV model from STB to select the appropriate firmware).</p><p></p><p>After that, the operator could see a rather blurry image of what was happening in the subscribers' homes, as long as the TV was turned on. With plasma panels, everything turned out to be simpler: in order to save screen resource, manufacturers equipped them with light sensors to automatically adjust brightness and contrast. By modifying the image (invisible to the human eye), removing the signal from the light sensor, it was possible to restore a picture of the situation in the room with a sufficiently high resolution.</p><p></p><p><strong>All-seeing eye.</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>However, after reviewing the research results, the NeoBroad company did not dare to use the Omniscience technology. Firstly, the management of the TV company was afraid that this would be regarded by subscribers as an intrusion into their privacy, and secondly, for the purposes of TV broadcasters, "spying" on the subscriber was useless - after all, you cannot put a lot of operators who determine what they are doing at the moment subscriber!</p><p>[/LIST]</p><p></p><p>To define the "context" automation was necessary, which required a hefty financial investment. For the same reasons, other TV companies also showed no interest in the new technology. But she was interested in those who are called "knights of the cloak and dagger" - the special services.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prime, post: 628, member: 18"] [IMG alt="f3770cc9f7f198589b516.jpg"]https://telegra.ph/file/f3770cc9f7f198589b516.jpg[/IMG] Level 99 Paranoid. [IMG alt="105b1185c40ebb93528c8.png"]https://telegra.ph/file/105b1185c40ebb93528c8.png[/IMG] ZOMBO BOX [URL='https://ia802902.us.archive.org/27/items/coronavirus2020.ru/Coronavirus%202020%20%D0%A1%D0%A3%D0%94%D0%9D%D0%AB%D0%99%20%D0%93%D0%9E%D0%94%20%20%D0%A1%D0%9C%D0%9E%D0%A2%D0%A0%D0%95%D0%A2%D0%AC%20%D0%92%D0%A1%D0%95%D0%9C.mp4']For starters, you can look at this vidos.[/URL] [B]Illuminati Freemasons CIA NSA FSB Russian hackers[/B] . Nesting dolls Bears Sweatshirts Balalaikas. This is all bullshit. Compared to what you learn. The ubiquity of digital television and flat panel televisions is an absolute boon to consumers. But it is possible that the special services will benefit from this much more - these two technologies make it possible to monitor everyone. Right at his house! In the late 1990s, television began to gradually lose ground in front of the aggressively advancing Internet. Television companies were baffled by the future loss of advertising revenue and wondered what alternative to offer their subscribers. But they had nothing special to oppose to the world wide web. [/LIST] Popular websites could operate with such a trump card as contextual thematic advertising, flexible and automatically adapting to the interests of the user, based on the history of his search queries, while when displaying advertisements, TV channels could focus only on the "average" subscriber, information about which was obtained from sociological research. With the advent of digital television (in particular, IPTV), this task has become even easier - it has become possible to track the data on the corresponding servers of providers. However, to show contextual thematic advertising, TV companies needed extremely unusual information - in particular, what exactly people are doing at the very moment when they are watching TV. [B]Do they prepare breakfast while doing this?[/B] Do you watch the program before going to bed while lying in bed? Do they dress in front of the mirror in the morning, watching the news on the screen out of the corner of their eye? And what was required was not just "averaged" data (even if based on studies of hundreds of thousands of people), but about each - yes, about each! - to the subscriber. [B]Unsolvable problem:[/B] With this seemingly insoluble problem, representatives of the television broadcasting company NeoBroad turned to the American research corporation FICTUM (Factual Integrated Collection and Trends Unification Methods), which specialized in such tasks. The research department of the corporation (Department of Advanced Concepts, DAC) at that time was headed by the legendary Canadian with French roots - Dr. Nicolas Pannier, who worked for a long time in the bowels of the American military-industrial complex. [I]The original idea of FICTUM engineers was very simple - it was to install video cameras in all TVs. However, such a "head-on" solution to the problem was almost immediately abandoned (at that time, cameras were still quite expensive and not too compact, and it was a question of integrating a camera into every TV, that is, about hundreds of thousands or even millions of pieces!) ...[/I] And then Nicolas Pannier, who for many years has been developing stealth aircraft and phased radars in American defense companies, put forward a brilliant idea. He suggested using the TV screen itself for collecting data. [B]On the other side of the screen:[/B] When light hits them from outside, get a response. "It was in this direction that Panier's group began to work - scientists were engaged in registering a change in the control signal supplied to the transistors of the active matrix, depending on the distribution of the screen illumination outside. The research took six months. After that, Panier's group was faced with another almost unsolvable task - it was required to decipher the data obtained. The TV screen is not equipped with any optical systems, so there could be no question of any "image". Here Panier was helped by his past experience: after all, the phased antenna array (PAR) of the radar also does not have focusing systems. Taking as a basis the algorithms for restoring the radar signal, Panier had already by 2000 built a prototype of a system capable of "spying" on what is happening in front of the TV screen. Moreover, this did not require any hardware intervention in the TV circuit - the solution worked at the level of firmware (firmware) of an STB set-top box (Set Top Box, cable TV decoder) and a TV, which could be updated remotely via the network at the operator's command (data on the provider received the TV model from STB to select the appropriate firmware). After that, the operator could see a rather blurry image of what was happening in the subscribers' homes, as long as the TV was turned on. With plasma panels, everything turned out to be simpler: in order to save screen resource, manufacturers equipped them with light sensors to automatically adjust brightness and contrast. By modifying the image (invisible to the human eye), removing the signal from the light sensor, it was possible to restore a picture of the situation in the room with a sufficiently high resolution. [B]All-seeing eye.[/B] However, after reviewing the research results, the NeoBroad company did not dare to use the Omniscience technology. Firstly, the management of the TV company was afraid that this would be regarded by subscribers as an intrusion into their privacy, and secondly, for the purposes of TV broadcasters, "spying" on the subscriber was useless - after all, you cannot put a lot of operators who determine what they are doing at the moment subscriber! [/LIST] To define the "context" automation was necessary, which required a hefty financial investment. For the same reasons, other TV companies also showed no interest in the new technology. But she was interested in those who are called "knights of the cloak and dagger" - the special services. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
CARDING & HACKING
FLOODING & OFFTOPIC
On the side of the screen / VIRUS
Top