Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
CARDING & HACKING
FLOODING & OFFTOPIC
Carder Hunters
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prime" data-source="post: 626" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>5. They wrote about adokats here. In general, we have a new Criminal Procedure Code and with this Criminal Procedure Code we have cops. You have the right to carry a lawyer from the very beginning. He must immediately come running, relatives must bring him. At this stage, a lawyer can do a lot, since, according to the law, the operative does not really know how to work. A competent lawyer will immediately win you back, they have now been given the right to do so.</p><p>6. Here you correctly noticed that it is difficult to prove that you were sitting at the computer. Yes. Unrealistic. Even if at least the whole history of your machinations is on the screw. Say that you have a brothel at home, that your doors are almost open. List at least 3 prepared homies who have an idea of \ u200b \ u200bcomputers who allegedly have the keys to your hut. Meaning, not only you could sit at the computer, all doubts are in favor of the accused. Only here you really have good friends, so as not to let you down. Meaning, they confirm that in your home they are hanging out with you, and without you, and they are sitting at the computer, but all of you and they are in refusal of shenanigans. The current friends should not only be named orally, but written in the protocol. The approximate text of all your testimonies - "I did nothing, I do not know anything about computer crimes, not only I have access to the computer, but also this, this, this one. I refuse further testimony on the basis of Article 51 "and that's all. Let them try to present a thread, the prints will not help any more. Even though all transactions are in your name and mailing address. *** Your friends know them, who can joke, decided to make money anonymously?</p><p>Do not forget, you don’t have to prove your innocence, and your friends don’t have to, if they ask about an alibi, what did you do at that time, everyone answers, I don’t remember, no other otmaz. I DON'T REMEMBER!</p><p>In general, that's all for now, nothing else pops up in my head</p><p>. Good luck.</p><p>PS If someone would share their knowledge in carding like me with the cop's loopholes.</p><p>PSS Better not even ask how I know this</p><p></p><p>Oh yes, after they beat you out of the cops, immediately to the prosecutor's office with a statement about the lawlessness of the cops, from *** or in the department, they took the money (a lot of money), threatened to kill if I tell you like. The material for the robbery will be registered immediately in the PMC. Well, of course, they will break it down, they will leave the current infliction of bodily harm, but it will take a long time, and they will definitely leave you behind.</p><p></p><p>And then someone posted about the fact that drugs will be planted and imprisoned. In general, nonsense. Our UK is full of holes for this. Remember once and for all, whether there is a traffic cop on the road, a sergeant in the subway, in the office they ask if you have drugs or weapons, you don't need to smile and say that of course not, say that there is both. They will offer to get it, dig in your pockets and say that you can't find something, let them help you. VOLUNTARY DELIVERY OF DRUGS AND WEAPONS IS NOT CRIMINALLY PUNISHED. The main thing is to be searched in front of attesting witnesses. It happens that there are no witnesses. but they are inscribed. The lawyer will achieve their presence at the trial, and if the lawyer is efficient, then at the trial he will prove. that they were not. If the attesting witnesses are worse, but still do not give up, maybe they are police officers, then they will ruin the case. In general, you also need to be able to throw it. In most cases, what the opera is doing is interrogators and snoopers are falling apart. And the lawyers are good (ex-cops are the best in this business)</p><p>Just wait with the voluntary surrender of drugs until the moment when witnesses are found - if drugs are planted on you, then the opera counts that when asked "do you have drugs-weapons?" answer no. and the attesting witnesses are being dragged by normal ones. This question is asked with witnesses, here and answer boldly, that there is a pound of assorted drugs, and some other firearms. The cops will have interesting facial expressions.</p><p>In general, this is the way. From garbage- * CENSORSHIP ** CENSORSHIP ** CENSORSHIP * about V. But not 100% as you understood. I’ll still move my thoughts about what to do if the cops did everything correctly and didn’t ask you a question, but in the search protocol everything was as it should be (that is, the attesting witnesses confirmed that you didn’t surrender voluntarily).</p><p>Oh yes, after they beat you out of the cops, immediately to the prosecutor's office with a statement about the lawlessness of the cops, from *** or in the department, they took the money (a lot of money), threatened to kill if I tell you like. The material for the robbery will be registered immediately in the PMC. Well, of course, they will break it down, they will leave the current infliction of bodily harm, but it will take a long time, and they will definitely leave you behind.</p><p></p><p>So far, the only idea is to refuse, do not sign the protocol, DO NOT TAKE the packages with drugs IN HAND !!! hmm .. if you find it in the jacket, write that you found the jacket. did not climb into the pockets. let them prove what's wrong. in theory, according to the law, without your recognition in this scenario, one search protocol is not enough. the guilt has not been proven.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prime, post: 626, member: 18"] 5. They wrote about adokats here. In general, we have a new Criminal Procedure Code and with this Criminal Procedure Code we have cops. You have the right to carry a lawyer from the very beginning. He must immediately come running, relatives must bring him. At this stage, a lawyer can do a lot, since, according to the law, the operative does not really know how to work. A competent lawyer will immediately win you back, they have now been given the right to do so. 6. Here you correctly noticed that it is difficult to prove that you were sitting at the computer. Yes. Unrealistic. Even if at least the whole history of your machinations is on the screw. Say that you have a brothel at home, that your doors are almost open. List at least 3 prepared homies who have an idea of \ u200b \ u200bcomputers who allegedly have the keys to your hut. Meaning, not only you could sit at the computer, all doubts are in favor of the accused. Only here you really have good friends, so as not to let you down. Meaning, they confirm that in your home they are hanging out with you, and without you, and they are sitting at the computer, but all of you and they are in refusal of shenanigans. The current friends should not only be named orally, but written in the protocol. The approximate text of all your testimonies - "I did nothing, I do not know anything about computer crimes, not only I have access to the computer, but also this, this, this one. I refuse further testimony on the basis of Article 51 "and that's all. Let them try to present a thread, the prints will not help any more. Even though all transactions are in your name and mailing address. *** Your friends know them, who can joke, decided to make money anonymously? Do not forget, you don’t have to prove your innocence, and your friends don’t have to, if they ask about an alibi, what did you do at that time, everyone answers, I don’t remember, no other otmaz. I DON'T REMEMBER! In general, that's all for now, nothing else pops up in my head . Good luck. PS If someone would share their knowledge in carding like me with the cop's loopholes. PSS Better not even ask how I know this Oh yes, after they beat you out of the cops, immediately to the prosecutor's office with a statement about the lawlessness of the cops, from *** or in the department, they took the money (a lot of money), threatened to kill if I tell you like. The material for the robbery will be registered immediately in the PMC. Well, of course, they will break it down, they will leave the current infliction of bodily harm, but it will take a long time, and they will definitely leave you behind. And then someone posted about the fact that drugs will be planted and imprisoned. In general, nonsense. Our UK is full of holes for this. Remember once and for all, whether there is a traffic cop on the road, a sergeant in the subway, in the office they ask if you have drugs or weapons, you don't need to smile and say that of course not, say that there is both. They will offer to get it, dig in your pockets and say that you can't find something, let them help you. VOLUNTARY DELIVERY OF DRUGS AND WEAPONS IS NOT CRIMINALLY PUNISHED. The main thing is to be searched in front of attesting witnesses. It happens that there are no witnesses. but they are inscribed. The lawyer will achieve their presence at the trial, and if the lawyer is efficient, then at the trial he will prove. that they were not. If the attesting witnesses are worse, but still do not give up, maybe they are police officers, then they will ruin the case. In general, you also need to be able to throw it. In most cases, what the opera is doing is interrogators and snoopers are falling apart. And the lawyers are good (ex-cops are the best in this business) Just wait with the voluntary surrender of drugs until the moment when witnesses are found - if drugs are planted on you, then the opera counts that when asked "do you have drugs-weapons?" answer no. and the attesting witnesses are being dragged by normal ones. This question is asked with witnesses, here and answer boldly, that there is a pound of assorted drugs, and some other firearms. The cops will have interesting facial expressions. In general, this is the way. From garbage- * CENSORSHIP ** CENSORSHIP ** CENSORSHIP * about V. But not 100% as you understood. I’ll still move my thoughts about what to do if the cops did everything correctly and didn’t ask you a question, but in the search protocol everything was as it should be (that is, the attesting witnesses confirmed that you didn’t surrender voluntarily). Oh yes, after they beat you out of the cops, immediately to the prosecutor's office with a statement about the lawlessness of the cops, from *** or in the department, they took the money (a lot of money), threatened to kill if I tell you like. The material for the robbery will be registered immediately in the PMC. Well, of course, they will break it down, they will leave the current infliction of bodily harm, but it will take a long time, and they will definitely leave you behind. So far, the only idea is to refuse, do not sign the protocol, DO NOT TAKE the packages with drugs IN HAND !!! hmm .. if you find it in the jacket, write that you found the jacket. did not climb into the pockets. let them prove what's wrong. in theory, according to the law, without your recognition in this scenario, one search protocol is not enough. the guilt has not been proven. [/QUOTE]
Name
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
CARDING & HACKING
FLOODING & OFFTOPIC
Carder Hunters
Top